I’m Fred and I’m transgender – my gender doesn’t match the ‘girl’ label assigned to me by society as a baby. My gender’s non-binary – neither ‘man’ nor ‘woman’ but a genderqueer mixture.
When I talk about this gender mixture, I’m not talking about stereotyped traits of masculinity and femininity, but something much less tangible about the internal self. Layered over this internal gender identity, people outwardly express their gender in many ways; this outward expression is often about a desire (conscious or not) to be ‘read’ correctly by other people. Gender presentation might include clothes and accessories, hairstyles, patterns of speech and body language, and the various signals might be mixed and layered to express the nuances of identity. The signals might be carefully thought through or not thought about at all at a conscious level. Most people think of themselves and present themselves as men or as women (or girls or boys); a significant minority (including me) think of themselves as neither or both, and might present themselves in ways that express that.
I perceive myself and present myself to the world as a mixture of man and woman, masculine and feminine, with a definite overtone of masculinity. If we think of gender as a spectrum like this (blue for man and red for woman)…
… I’m somewhere between the second and third splodge from the left: not a man but nearer the masculine end of the spectrum.
Other people I’ve talked with about this have placed themselves at different points on the spectrum – some firmly at one end or another; some in different places in the middle bit.
Some people experience their gender identity changing over time, or being at different places at different times or in different circumstances. Some of those people might describe themselves as genderfluid.
Incidentally, I know people who identify themselves as very feminine and also as men, and people who identify themselves as very masculine and also as women. I’m sure there would be men and women who’d put themselves in the same place on the chart as me but would identify firmly with a binary gender.
(In fact there are way more layers and directions that the chart doesn’t address, because gender’s really complicated – but that’s also what makes it so interesting.)
Some people I’ve talked with about gender identity get confused about why I think it’s important. “I’m just me – I don’t really think about that stuff.” “I don’t know where I am on that spectrum – it doesn’t matter.” “I don’t feel like I’m not a woman, but I don’t feel strongly womanly or feminine either.” There isn’t a strong correlation between this and whether or not someone’s transgender: it’s not just that people whose gender identity matches the one assigned to them don’t have to think about it.
Some people – I’m one – have a very intense sense of gender identity. I don’t feel like the colours are irrelevant to me: I feel like I’m overflowing with my particular mixture of them.
Some people identify themselves as agender – not having a gender identity – so the spectrum of colours doesn’t work for them.
My working hypothesis is that the chart needs another dimension. Instead of the one line
it should be more like a grid or paint chart:
So identities can vary in …let’s call it “hue”
and also in intensity:
I’m somewhere towards the bottom left: quite masculine, and intensely gendered.
The intensity at which people experience their gender identity can vary as much as the hue of their gender. Because we talk about variations in the hue and don’t talk much about variations in intensity, people with a less intense gender identity can feel as though intensely-gendered people are making a big deal unnecessarily, and people with an intense gender identity can feel dismissed.
I hope that by being more aware of the different directions of variation, I can be more understanding of other people’s thoughts and feelings about gender.
30 and beyond said:
Lovely! I like the chart!
S Fred L said:
Thank you 🙂
feministwarrior said:
This was sooo informative! Thank you for sharing your story 🙂
feministwarrior said:
Also, I am in love with the charts you provided! Their awesome!
S Fred L said:
Thank you 🙂
Rhiannon said:
This is really useful, thank you. I wonder to what extent the ‘hue’ and ‘intensity’ variables map onto current uses of the terms ‘nonbinary’ and ‘agender’ – agender sounds like a good term for ‘so low intensity I don’t feel I have a gender’, but I’m not sure whether that’s actually how it’s used.
S Fred L said:
I would be interested in feedback from agender people now I’ve written this: some conversations with agender friends fed into this at thought-brewing stage.
Azaria said:
Hey there! I’m agender, and I was looking at this chart. I think it’s a fantastic representation, but I don’t personally feel like I fit on the chart at all. If anything, I’m a lack of paint. Agender isn’t just a gender neutral thing – it’s the absence of a gender. In addition, I feel this absence of gender pretty intently – so it’s not just extremely diluted. I can’t speak for others, though. This is just my thoughts.
Anyway, thanks so much for this post! I think it’s fantastic and a great conversation-starter.
S Fred L said:
Thank you! Yes, as I mentioned in the text, this representation really doesn’t work for agender identity: I didn’t want to just put a blank line at the top, because that might suggest that all agender people have a position on the horizontal axis, which felt inaccurate. I’d be very happy to hear suggestions of how agender could be properly represented in this sort of scheme, if there is a way to do that.
Posie Parker said:
That’s such an amazing read. It seems that you are a human and as varied and interesting, although slightly more navel gazing and narcissistic, as the rest of us.
No human becomes interesting just because they have a label.
Sorry. Not sorry.
S Fred L said:
I absolutely agree that it doesn’t make me any more interesting than anyone else.
Labels can be helpful for reassuring people that they’re not the only one (of whatever group) – which I guess can translate as “not being intrinsically interesting” too.
Clare Flourish said:
Have you heard of the gender diamond? It’s Rafael Carter’s expression: there are two axes, one M one end, F the other, and intersecting is bigendered one end agendered the other.
S Fred L said:
Ooh, no, I hadn’t. I will look it up – thanks.
Clare Flourish said:
I see a Google search needs quotes, and puts me second- behind a pinterest pinning to my post, which is irritating.
S Fred L said:
I have had a look at the gender diamond now. It’s interesting, but I’m not convinced that ‘polygendered to genderless’ makes sense as an axis.
Sheila Dong said:
!!! This makes me very happy, because I thought up a pretty much identical system for thinking about my own sense of gender. I tend to think of my gender as “kinda-androgynous-but-leaning-toward-the-femme-side, and also kinda agender” so that would make me a light pinkish purple. Color, for me, communicates things in a less clunky and more nuanced manner than words. I’m very happy that we think alike in this regard.
Clare Flourish said:
Did you hear Analysis on Radio 4, on the non-binary? It’s worth a listen, though I was a bit irked by the presenter’s repeated expression of her assumption that the audience would be discombobulated.
S Fred L said:
I haven’t heard the Radio 4 version yet – I was pretty impressed with the World Service version and assumed the R4 one would just be an edited version of that, but maybe I guessed wrong…
Clare Flourish said:
I had not heard it on the World Service…
S Fred L said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03r8pgf
Pingback: Links Roundup: 05/27/16 - Pretty Terrible
Pingback: London Queers: What does it mean to be "queer"?
Mylène said:
The paint charts are beautiful 🙂 You might also like the Gender Unicorn, created by Trans Student Educational Resources in California… very hackable. Instead of axes, it has “sliders”… so makes it easier to incorporate third, fourth, etc. genders that are common in Indigenous cultures. I like to imagine copy-pasting as many sliders as each person wants/needs.
S Fred L said:
Thanks – I will have a look.
Claire said:
I recently realised I was having GD issues and am still very confused, your chart nails it beautifully – I think I may print it in large and let a spinning top labelled ‘me’ run over it. Tnank you.
S Fred L said:
Thanks. I hope it continues to be useful.
themagicspaceship said:
I am genderqueer and think about it in colours too! I experience my gender as very intense green: a third gender that is its own thing, not derivative of the other two. After thinking about this I realised that the genderqueer flag is green, purple and white for this reason! That’s 3 of the common ways non-binary people experience gender I think. So maybe it’s something like this: https://cdn4.vectorstock.com/i/1000×1000/20/53/rgb-color-chart-vector-572053.jpg with intensity in the z-axis.
-Shu Ning 😉
Fred_SL said:
I like that!